Legal Opinion
R.I. Pools, Inc. v. Paramount Concrete, Inc.
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided May 6, 2014No. AC34363PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KELLER, J.
The plaintiff, R.I. Pools, Inc., brought this action under the Connecticut Product Liability Act (act), General Statutes § 52-572m et seq., seeking damages against the defendant, Paramount Concrete, Inc., for having sold it an allegedly defective product that it used in its construction of several luxury swimming pools for homeowners in Fairfield County. The defendant appeals from the judgment of the trial court, rendered following a jury trial, in favor of the plaintiff. The defendant claims that the court improperly (1) denied its motion to set aside the verdict, and (2)…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Johnson v. Georgia Highway Express, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- Berry v. LoiseauSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Champagne v. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Potter v. Chicago Pneumatic Tool Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Lynn v. Haybuster Manufacturing, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bifolck v. Philip Morris, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2016
- Harleysville Worcester Insurance v. Paramount ConcreteDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2015
- Iino v. SpalterConnecticut Appellate Court · 2019
- Whitney v. J.M. Scott Associates, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2016
- Whitney v. J.M. Scott Associates, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2016