Legal Opinion

State v. Gardner

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided July 21, 1981No. 376-79PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBillings, J.

The defendant was charged with breaking and entering in the nighttime, in violation of 13 V.S.A. § 1201. The only defense presented was diminished capacity due to voluntary intoxication. The defendant alleged that he wished to testify at his trial about what he remembered and what he could not remember on the night in question. This testimony would have related to his defense of diminished capacity. The defendant made a motion in limine to prevent the State from using the defendant’s prior convictions for impeachment if he chose to testify on his own behalf. The defendant specifically…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. People v. SandovalNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
  2. Brown v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. Morris W. Gordon v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
  4. People v. BeagleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Commonwealth v. BighumSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. State v. CatsamSupreme Court of Vermont · 1987
  2. Commonwealth v. MaguireMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
  3. State v. PatnaudeSupreme Court of Vermont · 1981
  4. State v. BrunelleSupreme Court of Vermont · 1987
  5. State v. MoranSupreme Court of Vermont · 1982

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API