State v. Nash
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the CourtPeck, J.
This is a timely appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Vermont District Court convicting him of the crime of attempted sexual assault. Trial was by jury. We affirm.
The defendant presents three questions for review. First, he challenges the information filed by the state’s attorney as .insufficient to indicate the exact offense with which he was charged. Second, defendant claims a violation of his constitutional right to be protected against the possibility of double jeopardy in contravention of the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution. Finally, he complains that the sentence…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. HastingSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- In Re: Constitutionality of House Bill 88Supreme Court of Vermont · 1949
- State v. BaileySupreme Court of Vermont · 1984
- State v. BilladoSupreme Court of Vermont · 1982
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- State v. HamlinSupreme Court of Vermont · 1985
- State v. StanislawSupreme Court of Vermont · 1990
- State v. HuntSupreme Court of Vermont · 1988
- State v. KinneySupreme Court of Vermont · 2000
- State v. PercySupreme Court of Vermont · 1986
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.