Legal Opinion
Riverview Floral, Ltd. v. Watkins
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided June 2, 1988No. 8550-3-IIIPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGreen, J.
This action was commenced in December 1985 by Riverview Floral, Ltd., against Jasper and Oletta Watkins to enforce the provisions of a covenant not to compete and to recover damages for its breach. Following a bench trial, the court found a breach, enjoined future breaches, and awarded damages to Riverview. The Watkins appeal.
These issues are presented: (1) Are the findings of fact supported by substantial evidence? (2) Based on those findings, did the court properly conclude there was a breach of the covenant not to compete? (3) Was the scope of the injunction and the amount of damages…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Thorndike v. Hesperian Orchards, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1959
- Larsen v. Walton Plywood Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1964
- V. C. Edwards Contracting Co. v. Port of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1973
- Management, Inc. v. SchassbergerWashington Supreme Court · 1951
- MIDLANDS TRANSPORTATION COMPANY v. Apple Lines, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1972
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Maids International, Inc. v. Ward (In Re Ward)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 1996
- National Propane Corp. v. MillerColorado Court of Appeals · 2000
- Spradlin Rock Products, Inc. v. Public Utility District No. 1Court of Appeals of Washington · 2011
- Labor Ready, Inc. v. AbisCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- SPRADLIN ROCK v. Public Utility Dist. No. 1Court of Appeals of Washington · 2011
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.