Legal Opinion
In Re Thompson
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Indiana
Decided June 5, 2006No. 06-01031PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON UST’S MOTION TO RECONSIDER ENTRY OF THE ORDER STRIKING THE CASE
ANTHONY J. METZ III, Bankruptcy Judge.
I. Background
The Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005 (“BAPC-PA”), applicable to bankruptcy cases filed on and after October 17, 2005, made significant changes in how, when and to what extent putative debtors could obtain debt relief. Among those changes is the addition of 11 U.S.C. § 109(h) which requires individual consumer debtors to either obtain or attempt to obtain credit counseling before filing their bankruptcy case. More than just another…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- In Re TomcoUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2006
- Dixon v. LaBarge (In Re Dixon)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
- In Re RossUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · 2006
- In Re RiosUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2005
- In Re SeamanUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 2006
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Adams v. ZarnelCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
- In Re ElmendorfUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2006
- In Re GossettUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2007
- In Re JonesUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · 2006
- In Re CrawfordUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Mexico · 2009
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.