Legal Opinion

In Re Rios

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York

Decided December 19, 2005No. 02-36745PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM DECISION STRIKING DEBTOR’S CHAPTER 7 PETITION FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH 11 U.S.C. § 109(h)(1)

CECELIA G. MORRIS, Bankruptcy Judge.

The issue raised in this matter is whether a Chapter 7 debtor’s failure to seek credit counseling as required by 11 U.S.C. § 109(h)(1) or seek an extension of time to obtain the necessary credit counseling as set forth in § 109(h)(3) voids the bankruptcy filing completely, or merely renders the case subject to dismissal. The Court finds that under these circumstances, the Chapter 7 case should be stricken, as opposed to dismissed. In this ease, the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re CleaverUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 2005
  2. In Re HubbardUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · 2005
  3. In Re FloresUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2003

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Adams v. ZarnelCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
  2. In Re TomcoUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2006
  3. Dixon v. LaBarge (In Re Dixon)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
  4. In Re RossUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · 2006
  5. In Re ParkerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · 2006

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API