Legal Opinion
Adams v. Zarnel
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided August 26, 2010No. Docket 07-0090-bk(L), 07-0091-bk(Con), 07-0092-bk(Con), 07-0097-bk(Con), 07-0098-bk(Con), 07-0099-bk(Con)PublishedCited by 139 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LIVINGSTON, Circuit Judge:
This case requires us to interpret the interplay of provisions of the Bankruptcy Code that arises when an individual or entity files a petition for bankruptcy without complying with the credit counseling requirements created by the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005 (“BAPCPA”), Pub.L. No. 109-8, 119 Stat. 23. In the course of our analysis, we interpret the credit counseling requirement, 11 U.S.C. § 109(h), the provisions that govern the commencement of bankruptcy cases, 11 U.S.C. §§ 301, 302, and 303, and the statutory section governing…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
- County of Los Angeles v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Weinstein v. BradfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Storer v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. Jerome CrosbyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by139 opinions
- Mhany Management, Inc. v. County of NassauCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2016
- Lotes Co. v. Hon Hai Precision Industry Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014
- Oneida Indian Nation v. Madison CountyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
- Novella v. Westchester CountyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
- DISH Network Corp. v. DBSD North America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
134 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.