Fritzky v. Pittsburgh
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion bt
Mr. Justice Drew,
These appeals resulted from the refusal of the court below to take off judgments of compulsory nonsuit, which the learned court said were entered because there was no proof that the defendant municipality was negligent. The answer to that ruling is found in the testimony, a brief summary of which follows:
On the night of February 21, 1936, Caroline Fritzky, plaintiff, was riding with her son in his automobile on West Carson Street, a much used thoroughfare of the City of Pittsburgh, when an automobile, owned and driven by E. L. Moorehead, traveling in the opposite…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- McLaughlin v. City of CorrySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1875
- Decker v. Scranton CitySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892
- Bailey v. Oil CitySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
- Manross v. City of Oil CitySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1896
- Dean v. City of New CastleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1901
3Cited by10 opinions
- Zieg Et Vir v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
- Keiser v. Philadelphia Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
- Ward v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
- Strauch v. ScrantonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
- Reedy Et Vir v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.