Hulings v. Pittsburgh
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Hirt, J.,
Opinion by
The wife-plaintiff was injured by a fall on an icy sidewalk. The jury found for both plaintiffs against the city alone; the other defendants, owners of the property, were not in possession. This appeal questions the refusal of the lower court to enter judgments for defendant city n.o.v. Whether the city is chargeable with negligence, is the issue. The question of contributory negligence, clearly, was for the jury.
Considered wholly from plaintiffs’ viewpoint, these facts appear from the testimony: About 9:3.0 o’clock in the evening of January 4, 1940, “a bitter cold night”…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Burns v. City of PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
- Davis v. PotterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
- Mars v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
- Bailey v. Oil CitySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
- Beebe v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Rinaldi v. LevineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
- Harrison Et Vir. v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
- Williams v. ShultzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
- Zieg Et Vir v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
- Hillelson v. RennerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.