Goodman v. Queen City Lines, Inc.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Stacy, 0. J.
It is not perceived upon what theory the defendants Atlantic Greyhound Lines of North Carolina, Inc., Eagle Bus Lines, lnc., and W. M. Shelton, trading as The Eed Top Bus Lines, can be held liable for plaintiff’s injuries. These lines were not lessees of the station in which she was injured, nor was the plaintiff a passenger on any of them, either actual or prospective. She did not intend to become such. The demurrer to the evidence, interposed by these defendants, should have been sustained.
The defendants Camel City Coach Company, Skyland Stages, Inc., and Queen City Coach…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Montgomery & Eufaula Railway Co. v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1884
- Louisville, New Albany & Chicago R. W. Co. v. TreadwayIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
- Peterson v. RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
- Quantz v. RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
- Monroe v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Cole v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
- McBroom v. S. E. Greyhound LinesCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1945
- Crowell v. Eastern Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- Ahlquist v. Mulvaney Realty Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1944
- Cole v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.