Legal Opinion

McBroom v. S. E. Greyhound Lines

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided June 28, 1945PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHale, J.

The plaintiffs “below prosecute this appeal from the action of the trial judge in granting peremptory instruction at the close of their proof.

Mrs. McBroom’s suit was based on personal injuries she sustained, while that of her husband was for loss of services, medical bills, etc.

The Southeastern Greyhound Lines is a common carrier of passengers. The defendants Kirk own and operate the Peggy Ann Cafe at Rockwood, Tenn. This is a regular “Rest Stop” for the Greyhound Lines and is so advertised as shown by Exhibit “B” to Scott McBroom’s testi mony. It seems that this arrangement is mutually…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Moody v. Gufl Refining Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Ill. Cent. R. Co. v. NicholsTennessee Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Loew's Nashville & Knoxville Corp. v. DurrettCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1934
  4. Hicks v. HerbertTennessee Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Knoxville Cab Co. v. MillerTennessee Supreme Court · 1940

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Management Services, Inc. v. HellmanCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1955
  2. Harrison v. Southern Ry. Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1948
  3. Central Truckaway System, Inc. v. WaltnerCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1952
  4. Hale v. RayburnCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1953
  5. Chattanooga Gas Company v. UnderwoodCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1954

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API