Legal Opinion
Crowell v. Eastern Air Lines, Inc.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided April 7, 1954No. 523PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPaekeb, J.
The Air Lines appellant assigns as error the failure of the trial court to grant its motion for judgment of nonsuit, made at the close of plaintiff’s evidence, and renewed at the close of all the evidence.
Its first contention in support of such motion is that plaintiff’s action is barred for failure to file claim and bring suit in apt time as set forth in “General Rules, Paragraph 17, Claims, (A) Personal Injury and Death — Time Limitations.”
The first question presented for our decision is whether under the Civil Aeronautics Act, and the Regulations of the Civil Aeronautics Board, Air Lines…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Boston & Maine Railroad v. HookerSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad v. NothnagleSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- The MajesticSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. DettlebachSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Hunsucker v. High Point Bending & Chair Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Hayes v. City of WilmingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
- Vetco Concrete Company v. TROY LUMBER COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- Greene v. Charlotte Chemical Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
- Keith v. DayCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
- Edwards v. HamillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.