Legal Opinion

Rogers v. Multiple Injury Trust Fund

Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided April 18, 2003No. 97,680PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

LARRY JOPLIN, Chief Judge.

11 Petitioner Donald Rogers (Claimant) seeks review of the trial court's order denying him benefits for combined, materially increased permanent partial disability (PPD) from Respondent Multiple Injury Trust Fund (Fund) as barred by operation of 85 O.S. Supp.1999 § 172(A)(2)(b) (effective November 1, 1999). In this appeal, Claimant asserts the trial court erred as a matter of law in holding his claim untimely filed, and in so holding, violated his Constitutionally guaranteed rights to due process and equal protection of the laws, as well as the state…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Loftis v. Multiple Injury Trust FundCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2003

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Anderson Mechanical, Inc. v. SpiegelCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2005
  2. Anderson Mechanical, Inc. v. SpiegelCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2005
  3. Keco, Inc. v. HaywardCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2005
  4. Keco, Inc. v. HaywardCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API