Legal Opinion

Byer v. Lucas, 08-No-351 (3-9-2009)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 9, 2009No. 08-NO-351PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

{¶ 1} Plaintiff-appellant, Lori Byer (Byer), appeals a decision of the Noble County Court of Common Pleas denying her claim of negligence against defendant-appellee, Ken Lucas (Lucas). Byer contends the trial court erred in finding that Lucas was exempt from liability under the recreational user immunity statute, R.C. 1533.181. Byer also contends that the trial court incorrectly applied the doctrine of primary assumption of the risk.

{¶ 2} On August 19, 2006, Byer participated in a hayride as part of the festivities at a house party. (Byer Depo. 13, 16.) Both Lucas's hay wagon and a…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Mussivand v. DavidOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Thompson v. McNeillOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Marchetti v. KalishOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Gallagher v. Cleveland Browns Football Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1996

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Peterson v. Natl. Sec. Assoc., Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2018
  2. West v. DevendraOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
  3. Forman v. KrepsOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
  4. Luke v. Short Creek Joint Fire Dist.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API