Marchetti v. Kalish
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtAlice Robie Re snick, J.
The issue for this court’s determination is whether a participant in a recreational or sporting activity can recover for personal injuries received during the course of the activity absent evidence of reckless or intentional conduct.2 Stated differently, the question is whether a showing of negligence will suffice to allow recovery under these circumstances. The court of appeals adopted Sections 50 and 892A of the Restatement of Torts 2d, and essentially applied a negligence standard. Since these issues have not been previously addressed by this court, we must determine the proper standard as…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Turcotte v. FellNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Nabozny v. BarnhillAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975
- Dale Hackbart v. Cincinnati Bengals, Inc., and Charles "Booby" ClarkCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1979
- Ross v. ClouserSupreme Court of Missouri · 1982
- Kabella v. BouschelleNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1983
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by152 opinions
- Knight v. JewettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Anderson v. City of MassillonOhio Supreme Court · 2012
- Thompson v. McNeillOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- Cater v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1998
- Southwest Key Program, Inc. v. Gil-PerezTexas Supreme Court · 2002
147 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.