Legal Opinion

Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co. v. Public Utilities Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 21, 1996No. 95-2444PublishedCited by 73 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStratton, J.

The issue to be decided today is, in determining a motion to dismiss a complaint before the commission alleging a violation of the Certified Territory Act, can the commission look beyond two individual contracts, over which the commission admittedly has no jurisdiction, to determine whether the totality of the evidence alleges a potential violation of the Certified Territory Act?

Our review of this issue is a question of law. Accordingly, we address this issue using a de novo standard of review. Indus. Energy Consumers of Ohio Power Co. v. Pub. Util. Comm. (1994), 68 Ohio St.3d 559, 563, 629…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. O'Brien v. University Community Tenants Union, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Vail v. Plain Dealer Publishing Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Federal Power Commission v. Southern California Edison Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Industrial Energy Consumers of Ohio Power Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1994

3Cited by73 opinions

  1. Groob v. KeyBankOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Wiles v. Medina Auto PartsOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Wiles v. Medina Auto PartsOhio Supreme Court · 2002

68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API