State v. Weilert
Court of Appeals of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
Leben, J.:
After Paul Weilert was charged with felony driving under the influence of alcohol, the district court ruled inadmissible two key items of the evidence against him — -blood-test results obtained at a hospital treating him for medical purposes and Weilert’s statement to the medical personnel about his alcohol consumption. The district court held (1) that after a driver refuses consent to law enforcement for a blood or breath test, the State can’t get other test results; (2) that disclosure of a patient’s medical information was prohibited under federal law; and (3) that a Kansas…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- State v. AdeeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1987
- State v. CampbellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1972
- Kevin DWayne Kennemur v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2008
- State v. HumphreySupreme Court of Kansas · 1975
- State v. LaturnerSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hoeffner v. Kansas Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2014
- Hoeffner v. Kansas Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2014