Legal Opinion

State v. Weilert

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided March 5, 2010No. 102,917PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Leben, J.:

After Paul Weilert was charged with felony driving under the influence of alcohol, the district court ruled inadmissible two key items of the evidence against him — -blood-test results obtained at a hospital treating him for medical purposes and Weilert’s statement to the medical personnel about his alcohol consumption. The district court held (1) that after a driver refuses consent to law enforcement for a blood or breath test, the State can’t get other test results; (2) that disclosure of a patient’s medical information was prohibited under federal law; and (3) that a Kansas…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State v. AdeeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1987
  2. State v. CampbellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1972
  3. Kevin DWayne Kennemur v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2008
  4. State v. HumphreySupreme Court of Kansas · 1975
  5. State v. LaturnerSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hoeffner v. Kansas Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2014
  2. Hoeffner v. Kansas Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API