State v. Laturner
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Luckert, J.:
In Melendez-Diaz v. Massachusetts, 557 U.S. 305, 174 L. Ed. 2d 314, 129 S. Ct. 2527 (2009), the United States Supreme Court recently held that the admission of a forensic laboratory certificate of analysis without the testimony of the analyst, as allowed by a Massachusetts statute, violates a criminal defendant’s rights under the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution. In this case, we apply that holding to a similar Kansas statute, K.S.A. 22-3437, and determine whether the statute undermines the…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- State v. McCaslinSupreme Court of Kansas · 2011
- State v. DukesSupreme Court of Kansas · 2010
- State v. MossmanSupreme Court of Kansas · 2012
- Hilburn v. Enerpipe Ltd.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2019
- Brennan v. Kansas Insurance Guaranty Ass'nSupreme Court of Kansas · 2011
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.