Legal Opinion

State v. Laturner

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided October 9, 2009No. 96,086PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Luckert, J.:

In Melendez-Diaz v. Massachusetts, 557 U.S. 305, 174 L. Ed. 2d 314, 129 S. Ct. 2527 (2009), the United States Supreme Court recently held that the admission of a forensic laboratory certificate of analysis without the testimony of the analyst, as allowed by a Massachusetts statute, violates a criminal defendant’s rights under the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution. In this case, we apply that holding to a similar Kansas statute, K.S.A. 22-3437, and determine whether the statute undermines the…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. State v. McCaslinSupreme Court of Kansas · 2011
  2. State v. DukesSupreme Court of Kansas · 2010
  3. State v. MossmanSupreme Court of Kansas · 2012
  4. Hilburn v. Enerpipe Ltd.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2019
  5. Brennan v. Kansas Insurance Guaranty Ass'nSupreme Court of Kansas · 2011

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API