Legal Opinion

Hoeffner v. Kansas Department of Revenue

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided September 12, 2014No. 110323PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Standridge, J.:

After leaving an incident at a casino, William Hoeffner, Jr., was arrested for driving under the influence. The arresting officers read him the required implied consent advisory before requesting he submit to a breath test. He refused to do so until the officers repeatedly indicated that they would obtain a search warrant for a blood test; then, he agreed to the breath test, which he failed. Although Hoeffner argued the officers unlawfully coerced him into submitting to a breath test by threatening to obtain a search warrant, his driving privileges were suspended. His *880suspension…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  4. Smith v. Bayer Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2011
  5. State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. RyceSupreme Court of Kansas · 2016
  2. State v. StollSupreme Court of Kansas · 2021
  3. City of Dodge City v. WebbSupreme Court of Kansas · 2016
  4. State v. MerrillCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API