Legal Opinion

Hoeffner v. Kansas Department of Revenue

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided September 12, 2014No. 110323Published

1Opinion of the Court

No. 110,323 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS WILLIAM HOEFFNER, JR. Appellant, v. KANSAS DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, Appellee. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. When reviewing the district court's ruling in a driver's license suspension case, an appellate court generally employs a substantial competent evidence standard of review. If the issues raise only questions of law, such as the interpretation of a statute, an appellate court exercises unlimited review. 2. Substantial compliance with statutory notice provisions will usually be sufficient when advising a driver of his or her rights under…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  4. State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007
  5. Martin v. Kansas Department of RevenueSupreme Court of Kansas · 2008

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API