Legal Opinion

Texas Co. v. Mills

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1934No. 31194PublishedCited by 59 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, C. J.

'The appellee recovered a judgment against the appellant for damages from a personal injury for which he claims the appellant is responsible.

The record discloses that the appellant is a producer and wholesale dealer in petroleum products, and one of its hulk sales stations is at Walnut Grove, Miss. It is the lessee of the lot on which the station is located, and owns the buildings, tanks, and other necessities for receiving and storing its products, and from which they are sold and distributed. A sign was displayed on the premises on which was painted the word “Texaco,” a trade-name of the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Singer Manufacturing Co. v. RahnSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  2. Denton v. Yazoo & Mississippi Valley RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. Kisner v. JacksonMississippi Supreme Court · 1931
  4. New Orleans, Baton Rouge, Vicksburg & Memphis Railroad v. NorwoodMississippi Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Gulf Refining Co. v. NationsMississippi Supreme Court · 1933

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. Richardson v. APAC-Mississippi, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Texas Co. v. WheelessMississippi Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Harkins v. PaschallMississippi Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Tribble v. GregoryMississippi Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Louisiana Oil Corp. v. RennoMississippi Supreme Court · 1934

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API