Legal Opinion

State v. Ayala

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided February 7, 2017No. SC19466PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*592McDONALD, J.

**574We consider in this appeal whether allowing the state to amend an information after the commencement of trial to charge additional offenses without good cause constitutes per se reversible error. The state appeals, upon our grant of certification, from the judgment of the Appellate Court reversing the judgment of conviction of the defendant, Enrique Ayala, of three counts of interfering with an officer in violation of General Statutes § 53a-167a. See State v. Ayala , 154 Conn.App. 631, 656, 106 A.3d 941 (2015). The state contends that, in the absence of prejudice, the trial…

2Cases cited54 opinions

  1. Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. Rose v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. McCoySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2019
  2. State v. CushardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2018
  3. State v. Ruiz-PachecoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2020
  4. State v. FrazierConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
  5. State v. Morel-VargasSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2022

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API