Legal Opinion
Securities & Exchange Commission v. Grossman
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided June 1, 1995No. 87 Civ. 1031 (SWK)PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
KRAM, District Judge.
In this “insider trading” action, defendants George Hirshberg (“Hirshberg”) and Alan Hirshberg (collectively, the “Hirshbergs”) 1 and Israel G. Grossman (“Grossman”) object to a Report and Recommendation issued by Magistrate Judge Michael H. Dolinger on March 2, 1995 (the “Report”). For the reasons set forth below, the Report is adopted in full.
BACKGROUND 2
1. The Civil Proceedings
On February 17, 1987, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission” or the “SEC”) filed the present action against Grossman, the Hirshbergs and several…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. HealthSouth Corp.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 2003
- United States Securities & Exchange Commission v. VerdiramoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Current Financial ServicesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1999
- Klayman v. Judicial Watch, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Sataki v. Broadcasting Board of GovernorsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.