Legal Opinion
Jurado v. Levi Strauss & Co.
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided October 9, 1996No. 17074PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ALARID, Judge.
1. Employer appeals the order of the Workers’ Compensation Judge (WCJ) entered after remand from this Court. The prior opinion in this case reversed the issue of the admissibility of Dr. Fogel’s testimony, which had established a whole body impairment rating based on Worker’s neck and shoulder condition. Jurado v. Levi Strauss & Co., 120 N.M. 801, 802, 907 P.2d 205, 206 (Ct.App.), cert. denied, 120 N.M. 715, 905 P.2d 1119 (1995). After remand, the WCJ considered the testimony of other doctors and awarded permanent partial disability benefits and attorney fees to Worker.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Britt v. Phoenix Indemnity InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
- Cordova v. Taos Ski Valley, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1995
- Corn v. New Mexico Educators Federal Credit UnionNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1994
- AA Oilfield Service, Inc. v. New Mexico State Corp. CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
- Gomez v. Bernalillo County Clerk's OfficeNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1994
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Torres v. Plastech Corp.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1997
- Hanrahan v. State ex rel. Human Servs. Dep'tNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2025