Legal Opinion
AA Oilfield Service, Inc. v. New Mexico State Corp. Commission
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided August 17, 1994No. 20771PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RANSOM, Justice.
Broom Transportation, Inc. and Hughes Services, Inc. jointly petitioned the State Corporation Commission for the transfer to Hughes of Broom’s certificate of public convenience and necessity for the transportation of water and oil field supplies and equipment. AA Oilfield Service, Inc. and other common carriers (collectively, “AA Oilfield”) opposed this transfer and petitioned the Commission to revoke or cancel Broom’s certificate. The Commission granted the Broom-Hughes petition for transfer and denied the AA Oilfield petition for revocation. The district court…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Office of Personnel Management v. RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Silva v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1987
- Hale v. Basin Motor Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1990
- Duke City Lumber Co. v. New Mexico Environmental Improvement BoardNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1984
- C & H Construction & Paving Co. v. Citizens BankNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1979
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Diaz v. SalazarDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 1996
- Wilcox v. New Mexico Board of Acupuncture & Oriental MedicineNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2012
- In Re Gray Line Hawai'i, Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2000
- New Mexico Mining Ass'n v. New Mexico Mining CommissionNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1996
- Gila Res. Info. Project, Amigos Bravos, Turner Ranch Props., L.P. v. New Mex. Water Quality Control Comm'nNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2018
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.