Legal Opinion
Lillbask ex rel. Mauclaire v. Connecticut Department of Education
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided February 2, 2005No. 03-7274PublishedCited by 153 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RAQGI, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff-appellant, Ingabritt Lillbask, the legal guardian of Lindsey Mauclaire, a disabled child, sued defendants-appellees, the Connecticut Department of Education, Commissioner Theodore S. Sergi, the Connecticut Board of Education, Hearing Officer Mary Gelfman, the Redding Board of Education, and Redding School Superintendent Kenneth Freeston (hereinafter “defendants”), for violations of both the United States and Connecticut Constitutions as well as various federal and state statutes, notably the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (“IDEA”), 20 U.S.C. §§…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- San Antonio Independent School District v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Spencer v. KemnaSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Powell v. McCormackSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Board of Education of the Hendrick Hudson Central School District v. Rowley Ex Rel. RowleySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by153 opinions
- T.Y. Ex Rel. T.Y. v. New York City Department of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
- M.H. v. New York City Department of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
- Mhany Management, Inc. v. County of NassauCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2016
- Ali v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
- Doe Ex Rel. Doe v. East Lyme Board of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015
148 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.