Lillbask Ex Rel. Mauclaire v. Sergi
District Court, D. Connecticut
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON SECOND MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
DORSEY, Senior District Judge.
Plaintiff moves to submit additional evidence. State Defendants and Redding Defendants each separately move for summary judgment against Plaintiff. Plaintiff separately cross-moves for summary judgment against State Defendants and Red-ding Defendants. Plaintiff moves to compel discovery. Plaintiff moves for relief from the previous summary judgment ruling.
I. JURISDICTION
Subject matter jurisdiction is pursuant to 20 U.S.C. § 1415(i)(3)(A) and 28 U.S.C. § 1331.
II. BACKGROUND
A. Factual Background
Lindsey Mauclaire, a…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Buckhannon Board & Care Home, Inc. v. West Virginia Dept. of Health and Human ResourcesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Board of Education of the Hendrick Hudson Central School District v. Rowley Ex Rel. RowleySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Honig v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Lillbask ex rel. Mauclaire v. Connecticut Department of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
- Days Inn Worldwide, Inc. v. Sonia InvestmentsDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2006
- Lillbask v. State of Connecticut Department of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
- Jackson v. Birmingham Board of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
- G.B. Ex Rel. N.B. v. Tuxedo Union Free School DistrictDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.