Legal Opinion

Verfenstein v. Deiglmayr

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided January 2, 1940PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtSturtevant, J.

In this action plaintiff seeks to recover an unpaid balance claimed to be due from defendant as a part of the purchase price for a tea room business and equipment sold by plaintiff to defendant in the summer of 1936. Declaration is in the common counts. Plea, general issue with a special plea of fraud. Trial by court and upon the findings filed defendant had judgment. The case is here upon plaintiff’s exceptions.

Plaintiff’s first exception is to a portion of finding No. 6 which finding is as follows:

“The plaintiff’s evidence tended to show that one thousand dollars was to be paid at once and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Blaisdell & Barron v. DavisSupreme Court of Vermont · 1900
  2. Right Printing Co., Inc. v. StevensSupreme Court of Vermont · 1935
  3. James v. AikenSupreme Court of Vermont · 1874
  4. Town of Barton v. Town of AlbanySupreme Court of Vermont · 1936

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Wakefield v. Champlain Marine Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API