Legal Opinion

Town of Barton v. Town of Albany

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided May 5, 1936PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoulton, J.

This is an action brought under the provisions of P. L. 3923 and 3924 to recover for money expended for the relief of Margaret Coffey, a poor person in need of assistance. The amount expended, and the sufficiency of the notice to the defendant, were conceded. The only issue was whether the pauper had last resided for three years, supporting herself, in the defendant town, as required by the statute. The plea was the general denial, the trial was by jury with verdict and judgment for the plaintiff, and the cause is here upon the defendant’s exceptions.

Walter Coffey, the son of Margaret, who…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Blaisdell & Barron v. DavisSupreme Court of Vermont · 1900
  2. Limerick National Bank v. AdamsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1897
  3. Kimball v. Boston, Concord & Montreal RailroadSupreme Court of Vermont · 1882
  4. James v. AikenSupreme Court of Vermont · 1874

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Town of Barton v. Town of AlbanySupreme Court of Vermont · 1937
  2. Verfenstein v. DeiglmayrSupreme Court of Vermont · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API