Legal Opinion

Heintz v. Southern Pacific Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 5, 1944No. Civ. 3119PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*700BARNARD, P. J.

This is an action for damages for the death of Robert Heintz who was killed about 3:45 a.m. on November 11, 1941, when an automobile being driven by him collided with a loaded fruit car standing on one of the main streets of Sanger. He was 25 years old, and married. His wife was killed in the same accident and this action was brought by his parents as his sole heirs at law.

The accident happened a short distance south of the intersection of M Street and Eleventh Street, in Sanger. M Street is a continuation of the main highway into the city and runs north and south. It is 59 feet…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Westberg v. WilldeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Mar Shee v. Maryland Assurance Corp.California Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Peri v. L.A. Junction Ry.California Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Koster v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Harper v. Northwestern Pacific Railroad Co.California Court of Appeal · 1939

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Pobor v. Western Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Martindale v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Raliway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1948
  3. Akers v. City of Palo AltoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  4. Levin v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  5. Aguilera v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1961

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API