Legal Opinion

Nationwide Insurance v. Calhoun

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 15, 1993No. 1167PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McEWEN, Judge:

This appeal has been taken from the judgment entered pursuant to the order which granted the petition of Nationwide Insurance Company (hereinafter appellee) and modified an amended arbitration award which had been entered in the amount of $400,000.00, in favor of appellant, John Calhoun. The trial court, finding that the arbitrators had committed an error of law in reforming the policy, modified the amended award of the arbitrators to provide for an award of $300,000.00 in favor of appellant. We affirm.

Appellant, John Calhoun, sustained serious personal injuries as a result of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Allen v. Erie InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Botsko v. Donegal Mutual InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  3. Boyce v. St. Paul Property & Liability InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  4. DeMichele v. Erie Insurance ExchangeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  5. Popskyj v. Keystone InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Rudloff v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  2. Racicot v. Erie Insurance ExchangeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  3. Erie Insurance Group v. ShueSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  4. Scott v. Erie Insurance GroupSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  5. Northern Ins. Co. of New York v. DotteryDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1998

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API