Abrams v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
FERREN, Associate Judge:
In these consolidated appeals, 1 Christopher A. Abrams and Billy Ray Dunn, Jr., challenge their sentences imposed under the so-called “mandatory-minimum” provisions of the District of Columbia Code. D.C.Code § 22 — 3202(a)(1) (1981 & 1987 Supp.). 2 Section 22-3202 (a)(1), as amended in response to a voter initiative effective June 7, 1983, 3 mandates a sentence of not less than five years for anyone convicted of a “crime of violence ... while armed with a pistol or firearm.” Appellants present three arguments. First, they contend that, although labeled as a sentencing…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Sandstrom v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Rose v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. LemireCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
- Tuten v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Ingram v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
- Alaskans for a Common Language, Inc. v. KritzAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
- Thomas v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
- Akins v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
- Morton v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.