Legal Opinion

Abrams v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided September 25, 1987No. 85-176, 86-647PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FERREN, Associate Judge:

In these consolidated appeals, 1 Christopher A. Abrams and Billy Ray Dunn, Jr., challenge their sentences imposed under the so-called “mandatory-minimum” provisions of the District of Columbia Code. D.C.Code § 22 — 3202(a)(1) (1981 & 1987 Supp.). 2 Section 22-3202 (a)(1), as amended in response to a voter initiative effective June 7, 1983, 3 mandates a sentence of not less than five years for anyone convicted of a “crime of violence ... while armed with a pistol or firearm.” Appellants present three arguments. First, they contend that, although labeled as a sentencing…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Sandstrom v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Rose v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. United States v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. United States v. LemireCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
  5. Tuten v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Ingram v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. Alaskans for a Common Language, Inc. v. KritzAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Thomas v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. Akins v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. Morton v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API