Legal Opinion

Akins v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided June 20, 1996No. 91-CF-860, 91-CF-1026, 91-CF-1034 and 91-CF-1083PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RUIZ, Associate Judge:

This case, in which we affirm the judgment in part and remand in part, arises from offenses that were made somewhat extraordinary by the fact that its participants memorialized the developing events on film. On October 28, 1989, appellants Michael Akins, Robert Taper, Joel Carrero, and William Barnes, as well as former codefendant Bryan Davis1 and other juvenile and unindicted coconspirators, assaulted two individuals in two separate incidents with the ultimate goal of robbing them. Lonnie Bryant, the government’s key witness, testified that on the evening of October 28,…

2Cases cited80 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968

75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Wilson-Bey v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
  2. Coleman v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. Flores v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. Morten v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004
  5. Hammond v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API