Legal Opinion

Ingram v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided June 21, 1991No. 88-1345PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FERREN, Associate Judge:

An indictment jointly charged appellant Ingram and codefendant Morgan with offenses attributable to the armed robbery of a Georgetown video arcade on May 9, 1988. After a jury trial in August 1989, appellant was convicted of armed robbery, D.C.Code §§ 22-2901, -3202 (1989), and was sentenced to prison for fifteen years to life. On appeal, he argues (1) the trial judge committed reversible error in failing to sever the defendants’ trials because their defenses were irreconcilable and there was a danger the jury would unjustifiably infer from this conflict alone that…

2Cases cited55 opinions

  1. Holland v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  2. Pinkerton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Stirone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  4. Russell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. Ex Parte BainSupreme Court of the United States · 1887

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. United States v. SpinneyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
  2. In Re McBrideDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. Prophet v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. Roy v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. Perry v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API