Legal Opinion

Lawless v. Pitchford

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 14, 1911No. 1067PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error from Craig County Court; Theodore D. B. Frear, Judge. Action between P. J. Lawless and A. J. Pitehford, guardian. From the judgment, Lawless brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.

Rule 25 of this court (20 Okla. xii, 95 Pac. viii) provides in part as follows:

“The brief shall contain the specifications of the errors complained of, separately set forth and numbered; the argument and authorities in support of each point relied on, in the same order.”

The brief of the plaintiff in error in no respect complies with the provisions of said rule.

The appeal is therefore dismissed.

TURNER, C. J., and HAYES, KANE, and DUNN, JJ„ concur.

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Cox v. KirkwoodSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  2. Worrell v. FellowsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  3. Indian Land & Trust Co. v. WidnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  4. McDonald Coal Co. v. Equitable Powder Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  5. Ball v. HallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API