Legal Opinion

Indian Land & Trust Co. v. Widner

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 11, 1913No. 2701PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error from District Court, Hughes County; John Caruthers, Judge. Action between the Indian Land & Trust Company and others and R. W. Widner. From the judgment, the Indian Land & Trust Company and others bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.

On August 2, 1911, counsel for defendant in error filed a motion in this court to dismiss this proceeding in error for the reason that the brief of plaintiffs in error, filed in this cause, fails to comply with rule 25 of this court. On August 1, 1911, counsel for plaintiffs in error accepted service of copy of said motion, and on September 30, 1911, filed a reply brief to the brief of the defendant in error, but in no way attempted to bring the brief in chief within said rule 25.

In Arkansas Valley National Bank v. Clark, 31 Okla. 413, 122 Pac. 135, the syllabus is as follows:

“Rule 25 of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Arkansas Valley Nat. Bank v. ClarkSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  2. Reynolds v. PhippsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  3. Lawless v. PitchfordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  4. Fire Ass'n of Philadelphia v. Bryant & WhistlerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Worrell v. FellowsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  2. E. G. Rall Grain Co. v. First State Bank of McQueenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  3. Ball v. HallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API