E.T. Horn Co. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
1Opinion of the Court
Aquilino, Judge:
This action, which has been designated a test case pursuant to CIT Rule 84(b), challenges classification by the U.S. Customs Service of penta-ethylenehexamine (“PEHA”) “bottoms” and bishexamethylenetriamine (“BHMT”) residues from Japan under Schedule 4 of the Tariff Schedules of the United States (“TSUS”), Part 2 (“Chemical Elements, Inorganic and Organic Compounds, and Mixtures”) as “Mixtures of two or more organic compounds: * * * Other”, item 430.20.1
The plaintiff claims that this merchandise should have entered duty free in accordance with TSUS item 793.00, which covered…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Jarvis Clark Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Jarvis Clark Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Patton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- F. L. Smidth & Company v. The United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1969
- Northam Warren Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Precision Specialty Metals, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2000
- E.T. Horn Company v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991