Legal Opinion

E.T. Horn Co. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided November 27, 1990No. Court No. 84-12-01730PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Aquilino, Judge:

This action, which has been designated a test case pursuant to CIT Rule 84(b), challenges classification by the U.S. Customs Service of penta-ethylenehexamine (“PEHA”) “bottoms” and bishexamethylenetriamine (“BHMT”) residues from Japan under Schedule 4 of the Tariff Schedules of the United States (“TSUS”), Part 2 (“Chemical Elements, Inorganic and Organic Compounds, and Mixtures”) as “Mixtures of two or more organic compounds: * * * Other”, item 430.20.1

The plaintiff claims that this merchandise should have entered duty free in accordance with TSUS item 793.00, which covered…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Jarvis Clark Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
  2. Jarvis Clark Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
  3. Patton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  4. F. L. Smidth & Company v. The United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1969
  5. Northam Warren Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Precision Specialty Metals, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2000
  2. E.T. Horn Company v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API