Legal Opinion
E.T. Horn Company v. The United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided September 18, 1991No. 91-1176PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Per curiam
The grant of summary judgment for the government upholding the challenged U.S. Customs Service classification is affirmed, and the carefully considered and detailed opinion of the Court of International Trade (Aquilino, J.) dated November 27, 1990, 752 F.Supp. 476 (1990), is hereby adopted as the opinion of this court.
AFFIRMED.
UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE
Opinion
Decided: November 27, 1990
AQUILINO, Judge:
This action, which has been designated a test case pursuant to CIT Rule 84(b), challenges classification by the U.S. Customs Service of penta-ethylenehexamine (“PEHA”) “bottoms”…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Jarvis Clark Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Jarvis Clark Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Patton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- F. L. Smidth & Company v. The United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1969
- Northam Warren Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Precision Specialty Metals, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2000
- Archer Daniels Midland Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- Archer Daniels Midland Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2008
- ADC Telecomms., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2017
- Archer Daniels Midland Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.