Legal Opinion
Canel and Hale, Ltd. v. Tobin
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided April 12, 1999No. 1-98-1636PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gallagher
Canel & Hale, Ltd. (plaintiff), brought this action to recover fees for legal services rendered to the estate of Addean Crockett, a disabled person, and for punitive damages. Mary E Tobin, Aera Crockett, Annette Crockett-Cotton and Munday & Nathan (defendants) moved to dismiss the third amended verified complaint pursuant to sections 2—615 and 2—619 of the Code of Civil Procedure (735 ILCS 5/2—615, 2—619 (West 1994)). Defendants also moved for Supreme Court Rule 137 (155 Ill. 2d R. 137) sanctions premised upon plaintiffs failure to comply with prior court orders and instructions regarding the…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Steinberg v. Chicago Medical SchoolIllinois Supreme Court · 1977
- Illinois Graphics Co. v. NickumIllinois Supreme Court · 1994
- Hux v. RabenIllinois Supreme Court · 1967
- Fellhauer v. City of GenevaIllinois Supreme Court · 1991
- Dowd & Dowd, Ltd. v. GleasonIllinois Supreme Court · 1998
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Blondell v. LittlepageCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
- Lewis v. Lead Industries Ass'nIllinois Supreme Court · 2020
- Installco, Inc. v. Whiting Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2002
- Liu v. T & H Machine, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
- Romanek v. ConnellyAppellate Court of Illinois · 2001
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.