Legal Opinion

In re Bobo Patent Litigation

United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation

Decided December 13, 2011No. MDL No. 2297PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING TRANSFER

JOHN G. HEYBURN II, Chairman.

Before the Panel:* Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407, defendants Facebook, Inc., *1375and Linkedln Corporation seek centralization of seven actions pending in two districts as listed on Schedule A.1 Moving defendants seek centralization in the Central District of California.

Defendants E*TRADE Financial Corporation and E*TRADE Bank join in the motion. Defendants Charter Communications, Inc., Comcast Corp. and EasyLink Services International Corp. support the motion. Defendants Open Text Corp. and Captaris, Inc., join in the motion but ask the Panel to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re Arrivalstar S.A. Fleet Management Systems Patent LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2011

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re Unified Messaging Solutions LLC Patent LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2012
  2. In re Blue Spike, LLCUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2017
  3. In re Realtime Adaptive Streaming LLC Patent Litig.United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2018
  4. In re Uniloc USA, Inc., & Uniloc Luxembourg, S.A., Hpe Portfolio Patent Litig.United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API