In re Blue Spike, LLC
United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING TRANSFER
SARAH S. VANCE, Chair
Before the Panel: Patentholder Blue Spike, LLC, moves under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 to centralize pretrial proceedings in this patent litigation in the Eastern District of Texas.- This litigation currently consists of nine actions pending in four districts, as listed on Schedule A.1 Defendants 2 submitted a joint brief expressing their opposition to centralization. Should we decide to centralize this litigation, defendants argue that a Northern District of California, or a Central District of California transferee forum is appropriate.
On the basis of the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In Re Eli Lilly & Co.(cephalexin Monohydrate)United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1978
- In re Arrivalstar S.A. Fleet Management Systems Patent LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2011
- In re Brandywine Communications Technologies, LLC, Patent LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2013
- In re Bobo Patent LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2011
- In re Genetic Technologies Ltd. (´179) Patent LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2012
3Cited by1 opinion
- Fed. Energy Regulatory Comm'n, Atl. Coast Pipeline, LLC v. FercUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2018