Legal Opinion

In re Blue Spike, LLC

United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation

Decided October 4, 2017No. MDL No. 2794PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING TRANSFER

SARAH S. VANCE, Chair

Before the Panel: Patentholder Blue Spike, LLC, moves under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 to centralize pretrial proceedings in this patent litigation in the Eastern District of Texas.- This litigation currently consists of nine actions pending in four districts, as listed on Schedule A.1 Defendants 2 submitted a joint brief expressing their opposition to centralization. Should we decide to centralize this litigation, defendants argue that a Northern District of California, or a Central District of California transferee forum is appropriate.

On the basis of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In Re Eli Lilly & Co.(cephalexin Monohydrate)United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1978
  2. In re Arrivalstar S.A. Fleet Management Systems Patent LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2011
  3. In re Brandywine Communications Technologies, LLC, Patent LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2013
  4. In re Bobo Patent LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2011
  5. In re Genetic Technologies Ltd. (´179) Patent LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2012

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Fed. Energy Regulatory Comm'n, Atl. Coast Pipeline, LLC v. FercUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API