Legal Opinion

No Oil, Inc. v. City of Los Angeles

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 29, 1984No. Civ. 67806PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

THOMPSON, J.

The issue presented by this appeal is whether the trial court properly granted the motion of defendants, City of Los Angeles (City), and Occidental Petroleum Corporation (Occidental), to dismiss all further proceedings in the case pursuant to the three-year rule of Code of Civil Procedure 1 section 583, subdivision (c), and thus foreclose the plaintiffs from resetting their motion for attorneys’ fees pursuant to the provisions of section 1021.5. For reasons to follow, we have concluded that the trial court’s decision granting defendants’ dismissal motion should be reversed.

F…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Serrano v. PriestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  2. No Oil, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Folsom v. Butte County Assn. of GovernmentsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Gray v. Don Miller & Associates, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1984
  5. General Motors Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Maria P. v. RilesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Citizens Against Rent Control v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  3. Bach v. County of ButteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  4. Henneberque v. City of Culver CityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  5. McCoy v. Hearst Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1991

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API