Legal Opinion

Crozer's Estate

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 25, 1939No. Appeals, 5, 32 and 33PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Kephart,

The circumstances associated with these three appeals are much the same, and all may be considered in one opinion. The basic question in each is: Should divi dends from coal leasing or coal mining companies representing net income without deductions for depletion or depreciation be apportioned between life tenants and remaindermen, or, in other words, between principal and income? It is unnecessary to state the various estates, for life and in remainder, created by Samuel A. Crozer and his son John P. in their respective wills. Samuel died in 1910, and John…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Opperman's Estate (No. 1)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  2. Boyer's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
  3. Knox's Estate (No. 1)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  4. McFadden's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
  5. Flinn's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Carmany EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  2. Crozer EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  3. Du Puy v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1947
  4. Cronan v. Castle Gas Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  5. Coffield v. PeeleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API