Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

San Diego County Department of Social Services v. Penny H.

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 24, 1991No. D014377; No. D014675PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*5Opinion

NARES, J.

Penny H. (Penny) and Robert C. (Robert), parents of dependent child Taya C. (Taya), petition2 for extraordinary relief after the court, at a twelve-month review hearing held pursuant to Welfare and Institutions3 Code section 366.21, found Taya would not likely be returned to their custody within six months, terminated reunification services, and set a hearing under section 366.26 to select a permanent home4 for Taya.

Penny and Robert contend section 366.26, subdivision (k),5 providing for review of the order setting the hearing only by petition for extraordinary writ, is…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In Re William M.California Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Lavine v. JessupCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Superior Wheeler Cake Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  4. People v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
  5. Supple v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re Harmony C. CA2/5California Court of Appeal · 2014
  2. People v. IrahetaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  3. People v. Owens CA2/7California Court of Appeal · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API