Legal Opinion

People v. Johnson

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 27, 1981No. Crim. 14117PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GARDNER, P. J.

In this case we reject a concept which has crept into our judicial literature—the “arguable-but-unmeritorious” issue on appeal. We hold that an arguable issue on appeal consists of two elements. First, the issue must be one which, in counsel’s professional opinion, is meritorious. That is not to say that the contention must necessarily achieve success. Rather, it must have a reasonable potential for success. Second, if successful, the issue must be such that, if resolved favorably to the appellant, the result will either be a reversal or a modification of the judgment.

Some…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. People v. WendeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  3. People v. FeggansCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  4. In Re SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  5. People v. RhodenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. United States v. GrostefonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
  2. In Re SpearsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  3. People v. ValenzuelaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  4. Lee Robbins v. George Smith, Warden, California Department of Corrections, Lee Robbins v. George SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
  5. People v. HackettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API