Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Brady v. Preferred Florist Network, Inc.

Court of Chancery of Delaware

Decided June 7, 2001No. C.A. 18250PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LAMB, Vice Chancellor.

I. INTRODUCTION

The State of Delaware, ex rel. Attorney General M. Jane Brady, brought this action under the Consumer Fraud Act (“CFA”) 1 and the Uniform Deceptive Trade Practices Act (“UDTPA”) 2 against three related parties: Preferred Florist Network, Inc. (“PFN”), a New Jersey corporation, Newark Florist, Inc., a Delaware corporation, and Thomas Meóla. Meóla is a New Jersey resident, and according to the complaint, is the owner, manager, officer, and employee of both PFN and Newark Florist. Both corporate defendants allegedly have their principal place of…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. City of Philadelphia v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Oregon Waste Systems, Inc. v. Department of Environmental Quality of Ore.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Hughes v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Ruggiero v. FUTURAGENE, PLC.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2008
  2. Enzo Life Sciences, Inc. v. Digene Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 2003
  3. Carotek, Inc. v. Kobayashi Ventures, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
  4. ATM Shafiqul Khalid v. Elon R. MuskCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2025
  5. Bishop Macram Max GassisCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2014

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API