Legal Opinion
Mintz v. Mark Bartelstein & Associates, Inc.
District Court, C.D. California
Decided August 14, 2012No. CV 12-02554 SVW (SSx)PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO QUASH SUBPOENA TO AT & T, FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER, AND FOR SANCTIONS (Docket No. 23)
SUZANNE H. SEGAL, United States Magistrate Judge.
I
INTRODUCTION
On March 23, 2012, Aaron L. Mintz (“Plaintiff’) filed a Complaint for Declaratory Relief (the “Complaint”) against Mark Bartelstein & Associates, Inc., d/b/a Priority Sports & Entertainment (“Defendant” or “Priority Sports”).1 Plaintiff is a sports agent who previously worked for Defendant for eleven years before resigning on March 23, 2012, and accepting a…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Smith v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- City of Ontario v. QuonSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Downing v. Abercrombie & FitchCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. George H. Lustig, United States of America v. Gregory D. PedersonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- The Home Indemnity Company, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Lane Powell Moss and Miller, Defendants-Appellants-Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Negro v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- PPG Industries, Inc. v. Jiangsu Tie Mao Glass Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2017
- Amy St. Pierre v. Stephen J. GriffinDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2021
- Clarity Sports International LLC v. Redland SportsDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2020
- Davis v. Reliance First Capital, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2022
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.