Legal Opinion
Chan v. Barbour, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided July 12, 2017No. CIVIL ACTION NO. 16-5688PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Rufe, J.
Plaintiff Frances Chan, á woman of Chinese descent, alleges age, sex, and national origin discrimination by Barbour, Inc,, an international clothing manufacturer and retailer.1 Before the Court is' Defendant’s *523motion to dismiss and to strike portions of the Amended Complaint. For the reasons that follow, the motion will be granted in part and denied in part.
1. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Plaintiff was hired as a manager at Barbour’s Ardmore, Pennsylvania store in 2008, and became US Retail Inventory Planning and Allocation Manager in 2011,2 In January 2013,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Zipes v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Ala, Inc. v. Ccair, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Seitzinger v. Reading Hosp. and Medical CenterCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- CHALEPLIS v. KARLOUTSOSDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2022
- CHALEPLIS v. KARLOUTSOSDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2023
- Daniella Bonhomme; Tatiana Poulard; Aminique Kirnon; Selina Sacasa; and Quantavia Grant v. Denny’s, Inc., Gills Bloomsburg Inc. d/b/a Denny’s, Denny’s Corporation, and DFO, LLCDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2026
- Hicks v. LNUDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2022
- Hundley v. WAWA, INC.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2021
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.