Legal Opinion
United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 11, 1988No. Docket Nos. D007745, D008099PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
TODD, J.
In these consolidated proceedings United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company (USF&G) seeks primarily to overturn the Cumis decision (San Diego Federal Credit Union v. Cumis Ins. Society, Inc. (1984) 162 Cal.App.3d 358 [208 Cal.Rptr. 494, 50 A.L.R.4th 913]). USF&G asks that we order the trial court to enter judgment in its favor with respect to two issues in its unsuccessful motion for summary adjudication. USF&G prays for a judgment that it is not required to permit its named insured, Mayzar Realty Inc. (MRI), to select its own Cumis counsel, now Marc I. Kent, or to control at…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Gray v. Zurich Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1966
- San Diego Navy Federal Credit Union v. Cumis Insurance SocietyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- DiGenova v. State Board of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- People v. One 1941 Chevrolet CoupeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Golden Eagle Insurance v. Foremost InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- Jackson v. Rogers & WellsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- Blanchard v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1991
- Rockwell International Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- Grissom v. Vons Companies, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1991
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.