Legal Opinion

McClellan v. Beatty

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided April 7, 1944No. 17,187PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDraper, J.

— Action in ejectment by appellant. Complaint in usual form. Answer in general denial. Finding and judgment for appellees. Appellant assigns error in overruling his motion for new trial, which questions the sufficiency of the evidence and asserts that the decision is contrary to law.

The evidence discloses that on July 15, 1935, the Merchants National Bank of Muncie, then owner, executed with one Rose Tobin a written contract for the sale, on a monthly basis, of a two-story and basement building in the City of Muncie. Later the bank furnished funds for extensive alterations to suit a new…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Mishawaka St. Joseph. L. T. Co. v. Neu, Gdn.Indiana Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Smith v. SchweigererIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Holliday v. PerryIndiana Court of Appeals · 1906
  4. Rickes v. RickesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1923
  5. Kimberlin v. TempletonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1913

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Tobin v. McClellanIndiana Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Hall v. FitzgeraldUtah Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Workman v. DouglasIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. Gereke v. Peoples BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1948
  5. Beatty v. McClellanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1951

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API